{"id":16427,"date":"2026-09-04T17:31:39","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T17:31:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/?p=16427"},"modified":"2026-09-04T17:31:42","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T17:31:42","slug":"defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/","title":{"rendered":"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">DeFi has lost at least $1.3 billion to crypto hacks in 2026, but the biggest security problem is no longer simply vulnerable smart contract code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instead, attackers are increasingly targeting the people, private keys, validators and infrastructure that control decentralized protocols.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some of the year&#8217;s largest crypto exploits involved audited platforms whose underlying smart contracts worked largely as intended. Attackers instead compromised administrators, developers or verification systems and then used legitimate permissions to drain hundreds of millions of dollars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The pattern has become especially clear after the $285 million Drift Protocol exploit and the $290 million KelpDAO attack, which together accounted for $575 million in losses within just 18 days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Crypto hacks have caused at least $1.3 billion in losses during 2026.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Compromised private keys have overtaken traditional smart contract bugs as a leading attack method by value.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Drift Protocol lost $285 million after attackers gained access to administrative authority through social engineering.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>KelpDAO lost $290 million after a compromised LayerZero verifier enabled a forged cross-chain transaction.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>North Korea-linked TraderTraitor, part of the Lazarus Group, has been attributed to at least $575 million in losses from the two attacks.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cross-chain bridges remain particularly vulnerable because they rely on small groups of validators, signers or verification networks.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Coldcard hardware wallet exploit showed that key-management risks can affect individual crypto users as well as DeFi protocols.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Stronger key management, multi-verifier bridges, timelocks and operational security could prevent many similar attacks.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">DeFi Hacks Reach $1.3 Billion in 2026<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The scale of crypto theft in 2026 is significant, but the way attackers are stealing funds may be even more important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Data cited from CertiK and Forbes puts total crypto hack losses at approximately $1.3 billion during the first part of 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TRM Labs arrived at a broadly similar conclusion, with DeFi-related losses alone approaching the $1 billion mark.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">More than 30 individual exploits worth over $3 million have already been recorded during the year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, many of the largest attacks were not caused by familiar vulnerabilities such as reentrancy bugs, flash-loan manipulation or broken oracle logic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Attackers increasingly focused on gaining legitimate access.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Social engineering, stolen session credentials, compromised validator keys and governance attacks have become major sources of losses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The result is a difficult challenge for DeFi security: a protocol can have technically sound smart contracts and still lose hundreds of millions of dollars if an attacker obtains the keys controlling them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Drift Protocol Lost $285 Million in 128 Seconds<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the clearest examples occurred on April 1, when Drift Protocol lost approximately $285 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The actual fund drain reportedly took only 128 seconds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the preparation behind the attack lasted far longer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Attackers allegedly spent months posing as representatives of a quantitative trading firm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They attended conferences, interacted with Drift contributors and gradually built relationships with people connected to the protocol.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rather than attacking Drift&#8217;s smart contracts directly, the attackers eventually obtained administrative authority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Once they had access, they were able to use legitimate protocol functions against the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The attackers reportedly whitelisted a nearly worthless token called CVT and deposited approximately 500 million tokens as collateral.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They paired the asset with an oracle they controlled and then withdrew roughly $285 million worth of USDC, SOL and ETH.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The exploit demonstrated how dangerous administrative privileges can become once the key controlling them is compromised.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Drift&#8217;s Audit Had Already Identified the Risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the most concerning details was that a previous security audit had identified the underlying mechanism involved in the attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A 2024 Neodyme audit noted that administrative instructions such as InitializeSpotMarket could accept an oracle account without proper validation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the issue was classified as informational because only an administrator was expected to have permission to execute the function.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That assumption ultimately became the weakness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The code itself did not necessarily need to be broken if attackers could simply obtain administrator-level authority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Once the admin key was compromised, a previously low-priority finding became part of a nine-figure exploit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The incident highlights a broader problem with crypto security models that assume privileged keys will remain secure indefinitely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">KelpDAO Lost $290 Million 17 Days Later<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Only 17 days after the Drift exploit, another major attack hit KelpDAO.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On April 18, KelpDAO lost approximately $290 million through its LayerZero bridge infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The attack followed a different technical path but had a similar starting point: compromised credentials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the source material, an attacker socially engineered a LayerZero Labs developer and obtained session keys.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That access was then used to interfere with the RPC infrastructure feeding information into LayerZero&#8217;s verifier network.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">External verification nodes were disrupted, while compromised infrastructure approved a forged cross-chain message.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The bridge subsequently minted approximately 116,500 unbacked rsETH.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Attackers then used the newly created assets as collateral on Aave to borrow real WETH before moving funds away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The damage spread beyond KelpDAO itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aave&#8217;s total value locked reportedly fell by $6.28 billion within 48 hours, while nine protocols temporarily froze markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Arbitrum&#8217;s Security Council later used emergency powers to seize 30,766 ETH associated with the attacker, creating additional debate around decentralization and emergency intervention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Drift and KelpDAO Shared the Same Fundamental Weakness<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Technically, the two attacks were very different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Drift involved administrator access and social engineering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">KelpDAO involved compromised session credentials and cross-chain verification infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But both incidents exposed the same fundamental security problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A small number of trusted credentials had enough authority to affect enormous amounts of capital.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both projects had also undergone security audits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The exploits therefore raise questions about whether traditional smart contract audits are examining enough of the actual attack surface surrounding modern DeFi protocols.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Lazarus Group Linked to $575 Million in Losses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Investigators connected both the Drift and KelpDAO attacks to TraderTraitor, a subgroup associated with North Korea&#8217;s Lazarus Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The two incidents alone represent approximately $575 million in combined losses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Against the reported $1.3 billion in crypto hack losses for 2026, that means one threat actor may account for roughly 44% of the year&#8217;s stolen funds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Lazarus Group has a long history of attacks against cryptocurrency companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It has previously been linked to major incidents involving Bybit, Radiant Capital, Ronin Bridge, WazirX and Harmony&#8217;s Horizon Bridge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The significant change in 2026 appears to be the growing sophistication of its social-engineering campaigns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rather than simply sending generic phishing emails, attackers can spend weeks or months building relationships with specific individuals inside cryptocurrency companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The initial compromise therefore happens at the human level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Only after trust or credentials have been obtained does the technical stage of the exploit begin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Social Engineering Is Becoming a Core DeFi Threat<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Traditional security discussions often focus heavily on vulnerabilities inside Solidity or Rust smart contracts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But attackers increasingly recognize that compromising someone with privileged access can be easier than discovering a complicated technical vulnerability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A protocol may spend months auditing thousands of lines of code while a single administrator, developer or validator still possesses credentials capable of approving critical transactions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That changes the economics of an attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instead of trying to break cryptography or contract logic, an attacker can target the person controlling the key.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Drift and KelpDAO incidents demonstrate why employee security and key management now need to be treated as part of protocol security rather than separate operational concerns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Crypto Bridges Keep Breaking<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cross-chain bridges remain another major weakness in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Their role is inherently difficult because a bridge must determine whether an event on one blockchain is legitimate before releasing or creating corresponding assets on another network.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That process often relies on validators, signers, oracle nodes or verification services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If enough of those trusted parties are compromised, the bridge may approve fraudulent activity while technically operating exactly as designed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Several 2026 exploits followed this pattern.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">KelpDAO lost approximately $290 million through a single-verifier compromise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">AFX Trade suffered a roughly $24.15 million exploit involving compromised validator signatures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">VerusCoin&#8217;s bridge lost approximately $19.14 million across two separate incidents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Meanwhile, a Cosmos EVM underflow vulnerability affected MANTRA, TAC and KiiChain, producing combined losses of roughly $20.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">AFX Trade Shows the Risk of Validator Concentration<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">AFX Trade became another example of how concentrated bridge verification can create significant risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On July 22, five compromised validator signatures reportedly satisfied the two-thirds quorum required by the project&#8217;s Arbitrum bridge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Attackers were then able to drain approximately $24.15 million in USDC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The funds were transferred to Ethereum, exchanged for around 12,467.5 ETH and consolidated into a single wallet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The attack happened only 49 days after AFX had highlighted a security audit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That timing again demonstrates the limits of treating an audit as proof that a platform is secure against every possible attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">VerusCoin Was Exploited Twice<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">VerusCoin suffered two bridge exploits during 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first resulted in approximately $11.6 million in losses in May.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A second exploit in July cost another $7.54 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Together, the attacks resulted in approximately $19.14 million in losses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The repeated exploitation of the same bridge reinforces concerns that security problems involving trust and verification infrastructure can remain dangerous even after an initial incident has exposed weaknesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Multi-Verifier Systems Could Reduce Bridge Risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One solution already exists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instead of relying on one verification network, bridges can require multiple independent verification systems to confirm a cross-chain message before funds are released.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Such a multi-verifier design significantly increases the difficulty of compromising the bridge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An attacker would need to defeat multiple independent security systems rather than a single validator or verification layer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, adoption remains limited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to data cited in the source, approximately 47% of LayerZero OApp contracts \u2014 more than 1,200 applications \u2014 were still using single-verifier configurations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That makes the problem partly one of configuration rather than technological capability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The security tools exist, but many projects are not using them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Crypto Audits May Be Looking at the Wrong Attack Surface<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The events of 2026 have also raised questions about the traditional security-audit model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Smart contract audits are designed primarily to examine code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Auditors search for issues such as reentrancy, overflow vulnerabilities, incorrect access controls and contract logic errors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These reviews remain essential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But they do not automatically evaluate every part of a project&#8217;s operational infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They may not examine how administrator keys are stored, how employees defend against social engineering, how off-chain RPC systems are secured or whether bridge verification is sufficiently decentralized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Drift attack began with human trust and administrative access.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The KelpDAO incident involved infrastructure outside normal smart contract audit boundaries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In both cases, the contracts were only one part of a much larger security system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Coldcard Hack Shows the Key Problem Goes Beyond DeFi<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The compromised-key problem is not limited to decentralized finance protocols.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On July 30, attackers began draining Bitcoin from wallets secured by Coldcard hardware devices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the source material, a firmware problem caused a predictable software fallback to replace the expected hardware random-number generation process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That reduced the randomness used to generate some wallet seeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Attackers could then generate possible seed combinations on their own computers, compare resulting addresses with public blockchain data and identify private keys associated with real wallets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The attack did not require phishing users or physically stealing hardware wallets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Galaxy Research reportedly traced the initial wave to 1,082.65 BTC stolen from 1,196 addresses in only 41 minutes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By Aug. 7, the high-confidence estimate had reached approximately 1,596 BTC from around 7,300 addresses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Broader estimates exceeded 2,055 BTC, worth roughly $130 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At least 15 independent attackers were believed to have exploited the same weakness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Hardware Wallets Could Not Simply Be Patched<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Coldcard manufacturer Coinkite issued an advisory after the problem emerged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, a firmware update alone could not fix wallet seeds that had already been created using insufficient randomness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Those seeds needed to be replaced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The incident demonstrated a deeper lesson about cryptocurrency security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Private keys are only secure when the process used to create, store and authorize them is secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Even users following standard self-custody practices can remain vulnerable if the underlying key-generation process is flawed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Better Key Management Could Prevent Major Hacks<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The security measures needed to reduce these attacks are not necessarily new.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first major improvement involves key management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Multi-party computation wallets and hardware security modules can distribute authority across multiple parties instead of placing everything behind one critical private key.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Threshold signing can also require several independent approvals before sensitive actions are executed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This reduces the danger of a single compromised credential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Timelocks Give Security Teams Time to Respond<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another important protection is the use of mandatory timelocks on privileged actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instead of allowing an administrator to instantly execute a high-risk transaction, the system can introduce a delay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Monitoring tools can then notify security teams that an unusual privileged action has been requested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the Drift case, attackers drained the protocol in approximately 128 seconds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A sufficiently strong mandatory delay could potentially have created a window for intervention before funds left the protocol.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Operational Security Needs More Attention<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Crypto companies also need stronger operational security programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Code audits cannot stop an employee from being manipulated into revealing credentials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Projects handling hundreds of millions or billions of dollars therefore need security standards closer to those used by highly sensitive financial or infrastructure organizations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Privileged accounts can use hardware-backed authentication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">High-risk transactions can require multiple independent approvals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sensitive employees can receive dedicated social-engineering training.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Access can also be segmented so that compromising one developer or administrator does not automatically give an attacker control over critical protocol functions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Governance Can Become an Attack Vector Too<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Private keys and bridges are not the only concerns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Governance systems can also become security weaknesses when participation is too low.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Term Labs reportedly suffered an $8.5 million governance-related attack in August 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Near-zero voter participation allowed one wallet to gain control over protocol vaults at relatively low cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This highlights the danger of assuming decentralized governance is automatically secure simply because voting exists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Quorum requirements, vote-locking periods and emergency guardian mechanisms can provide additional protection against suspicious governance proposals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Known Vulnerabilities Still Need Faster Responses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Cosmos EVM underflow incident highlights another problem: known vulnerabilities are only useful if projects treat them seriously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the source material, Cosmos Labs had been aware of the issue since April 2026 but underestimated its severity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When attackers eventually exploited the weakness across MANTRA, TAC and KiiChain in August, emergency action came too late to stop the funds from leaving.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Responsible disclosure therefore requires more than simply reporting a bug.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Projects need processes for rapidly assessing vulnerabilities, coordinating patches and deploying fixes across connected ecosystems before attackers have a chance to exploit them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What the DeFi Industry Should Watch Next<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second half of 2026 could show whether the crypto industry has learned from the year&#8217;s largest exploits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One important metric will be multi-verifier adoption across LayerZero applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the share of applications using single-verifier configurations falls significantly from the reported 47%, it would suggest that protocols are responding to the KelpDAO attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Admin-key timelocks are another important indicator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Protocols controlling more than $100 million in total value locked may face growing pressure to implement mandatory delays for privileged transactions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Activity linked to North Korea&#8217;s Lazarus Group will also remain closely watched.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Additional TraderTraitor-linked attacks would indicate that its sophisticated social-engineering operations remain active.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cosmos-based networks will need to demonstrate faster patch adoption following the EVM underflow incidents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Meanwhile, crypto insurance markets could provide another signal of changing risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If providers reduce coverage or sharply increase premiums, it may indicate that insurers expect major attacks to continue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why DeFi Security Needs to Change<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The biggest lesson from 2026 is that protecting smart contract code is no longer enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">DeFi infrastructure has become a complex combination of blockchain contracts, bridges, validators, private keys, developers, governance systems, RPC infrastructure and off-chain services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Every one of those layers can become an attack surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Smart contract audits will remain essential, but protocols increasingly need to think about security as an organization-wide system rather than a code review performed before launch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The most damaging attacks of 2026 show that hackers do not necessarily need to break a protocol.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sometimes they only need to convince the protocol that they are someone it already trusts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DeFi has lost at least $1.3 billion to crypto hacks in 2026, but the biggest security problem is no longer simply vulnerable smart contract code. Instead, attackers are increasingly targeting the people, private keys, validators and infrastructure that control decentralized protocols. Some of the year&#8217;s largest crypto exploits involved audited platforms whose underlying smart contracts&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":16428,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63,70],"tags":[65,355,206],"class_list":["post-16427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-crypto-news","category-finance","tag-crypto","tag-defi","tag-hack"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working - Crypto News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"DeFi hacks have caused $1.3B in losses in 2026 as compromised keys, social engineering and vulnerable bridges replace smart contract bugs as major threats.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working - Crypto News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"DeFi hacks have caused $1.3B in losses in 2026 as compromised keys, social engineering and vulnerable bridges replace smart contract bugs as major threats.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Crypto News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-04T17:31:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-04T17:31:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/71-2.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Digital Vibe\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Digital Vibe\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Digital Vibe\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/56afc0b5a42e13762ccad410f131f96a\"},\"headline\":\"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-04T17:31:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-04T17:31:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2633,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/71-2.png\",\"keywords\":[\"crypto\",\"DeFi\",\"hack\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Crypto News\",\"Finance\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/\",\"name\":\"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working - Crypto News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/71-2.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-04T17:31:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-04T17:31:42+00:00\",\"description\":\"DeFi hacks have caused $1.3B in losses in 2026 as compromised keys, social engineering and vulnerable bridges replace smart contract bugs as major threats.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/71-2.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/71-2.png\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":720,\"caption\":\"crypto\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/04\\\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Crypto News\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Crypto News\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/Crypto-NEWS.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/Crypto-NEWS.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"Crypto News\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/crypto-news-desk\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/56afc0b5a42e13762ccad410f131f96a\",\"name\":\"Digital Vibe\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/37e93c2e55bfd306b5f3247c0ce7dba6687533106a6330857687e3dcd20fc018?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/37e93c2e55bfd306b5f3247c0ce7dba6687533106a6330857687e3dcd20fc018?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/37e93c2e55bfd306b5f3247c0ce7dba6687533106a6330857687e3dcd20fc018?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Digital Vibe\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptonewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/digital-vibe\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working - Crypto News","description":"DeFi hacks have caused $1.3B in losses in 2026 as compromised keys, social engineering and vulnerable bridges replace smart contract bugs as major threats.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working - Crypto News","og_description":"DeFi hacks have caused $1.3B in losses in 2026 as compromised keys, social engineering and vulnerable bridges replace smart contract bugs as major threats.","og_url":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/","og_site_name":"Crypto News","article_published_time":"2026-09-04T17:31:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-04T17:31:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1080,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/71-2.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Digital Vibe","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Digital Vibe","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/"},"author":{"name":"Digital Vibe","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#\/schema\/person\/56afc0b5a42e13762ccad410f131f96a"},"headline":"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working","datePublished":"2026-09-04T17:31:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-04T17:31:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/"},"wordCount":2633,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/71-2.png","keywords":["crypto","DeFi","hack"],"articleSection":["Crypto News","Finance"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/","url":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/","name":"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working - Crypto News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/71-2.png","datePublished":"2026-09-04T17:31:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-04T17:31:42+00:00","description":"DeFi hacks have caused $1.3B in losses in 2026 as compromised keys, social engineering and vulnerable bridges replace smart contract bugs as major threats.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/71-2.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/71-2.png","width":1080,"height":720,"caption":"crypto"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/04\/defi-has-lost-1-3-billion-to-hacks-in-2026-as-the-same-attack-keeps-working\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DeFi Has Lost $1.3 Billion to Hacks in 2026 as the Same Attack Keeps Working"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/","name":"Crypto News","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#organization","name":"Crypto News","url":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Crypto-NEWS.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Crypto-NEWS.png","width":500,"height":500,"caption":"Crypto News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/crypto-news-desk"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/#\/schema\/person\/56afc0b5a42e13762ccad410f131f96a","name":"Digital Vibe","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/37e93c2e55bfd306b5f3247c0ce7dba6687533106a6330857687e3dcd20fc018?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/37e93c2e55bfd306b5f3247c0ce7dba6687533106a6330857687e3dcd20fc018?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/37e93c2e55bfd306b5f3247c0ce7dba6687533106a6330857687e3dcd20fc018?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Digital Vibe"},"url":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/author\/digital-vibe\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16427"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16427\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16429,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16427\/revisions\/16429"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}